top of page

Protecting the health of our loved ones is something we can all agree on. We Energies’ rate case and proposals prioritize fossil fuel investments over the health of our communities: they would keep Wisconsinites reliant on fossil fuels that pollute the air in our lungs, contaminate the water we rely on, and destabilize our climate. 

WEC Energy Group, which owns several utility companies including We Energies, is proposing to:

smokestack.webp

Stop We Energies' Gas Buildout in Oak Creek

Billions in new fossil fuel infrastructure will harm our health, climate, and raise utility bills. 

What's Happening?

The Oak Creek project is a large methane 1,100 MW gas plant in South Oak Creek, Milwaukee County proposed by WEPCO.

 

If approved, it would be built in mid-2026 with an estimated cost of $1.2 Billion. This new infrastructure would make the Oak Creek Project one of the largest methane gas plants in Wisconsin.

To supply this new gas plant, We Energies is also proposing 33 miles of new pipeline and a new liquified natural gas facility which would cost an additional $364 million.

 

These figures only include construction costs and do not include the impact on our health, climate, and utility bills. 

Screenshot 2025-02-24 152337.png
Screenshot 2025-02-04 102930.png

What are the consequences?

Health Impacts: From extraction to combustion, methane gas contributes to increased health harms, including—but not limited to—cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, cancer, kidney disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders such as Alzheimer's, cognitive and behavioral issues, and negative effects on almost every organ system, including the kidneys, lungs, heart, and brain.

 

Environmental Impact: The pipelines will cause ecological damage to acres of wetlands, woodlands, and grasslands, destroying and permanently altering acres of habitat. 

Climate Impact: Methane gas projects have been consistently documented as being a significant contributor to worsening climate change. Historic droughts, floods, superstorms, record-breaking wildfires, and extreme heat -- will continue to worsen unless we cut greenhouse gas emissions rapidly.

 

Social cost: We Energies is proposing more than 2 billion dollars of methane gas infrastructure that will cause hundreds of millions of dollars of harm. We need clean energy infrastructure in Wisconsin. NO NEW GAS.

For more talking points and to submit a comment click here

What can we do?

 

The Public Service Commission (PSC) is the state agency that regulates utility monopolies in Wisconsin.

WEC Energy Group’s shareholder profits are higher than any utility company in the state and higher than the national average. Even though they claim to be (something about their energy goals) their energy portfolio is less than 4% renewables.

We can use the PSC to demand that We Energies cease their deadly Methane Gas Buildout

 


Join us in protecting the health of Wisconsin families. We all deserve clean air!

Resist We Energies Reckless proposals

Help us get the word out! 

Attend the town hall. Help us fill the room!

Submit a public comment. Every voice matters!

Attend the public hearing in person or on zoom!

Key Action Dates

No events at the moment

This is a health issue!

These proposals would harm climate and public health and increase energy burden, which  ​is the percentage of income a household spends on energy costs.

 

Explore the following resources to learn and share why energy burden is a serious health issue.

Screenshot 2025-02-25 094622.png

The Oak Creek and Paris gas plants would result in $3.6 billion-5.7 billion in health costs and hundreds of premature deaths over their operating lifetime. 

Utility Pole

Action Toolkit

Energy Justice

Action Toolkit

Take actionable steps toward a more equitable energy system

Screenshot 2024-07-24 115858.png

See more information about how gas harms organ systems.

FAQs
Citations

Citations

  1. Sierra Club. (2021). Energy burden in Milwaukee: Study reveals major disparities & links to redlined areas. https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/default/files/sce-authors/u560/2392%20MilwaukeeEnergy_Report_06_high%20%281%29.pdf  

  2. Sierra Club. (2024). Energy Burden in Milwaukee: 2024 Report Update. https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/EB%20report%20update%202024%20%281%29.pdf

  3. Brown, M. A., Soni, A., Lapsa, M. V., Southworth, K., & Cox, M. (2020). High energy burden and low-income energy affordability: Conclusions from a literature review. Progress in Energy, 2(4), 042003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/abb954

  4. Viggers, H., Howden-Chapman, P., Ingham, T., Chapman, R., Pene, G., Davies, C., Currie, A., Pierse, N., Wilson, H., Zhang, J., Baker, M., & Crane, J. (2013). Warm homes for older people: aims and methods of a randomised community-based trial for people with COPD. BMC public health, 13, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-176

  5. Liddell, C., & Morris, C. (2010). Fuel poverty and human health: A review of recent evidence. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2987–2997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.037

  6. Frank, D. A., Neault, N. B., Skalicky, A., Cook, J. T., Wilson, J. D., Levenson, S., Meyers, A. F., Heeren, T., Cutts, D. B., Casey, P. H., Black, M. M., & Berkowitz, C. (2006). Heat or Eat: The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and Nutritional and Health Risks Among Children Less Than 3 Years of Age. Pediatrics, 118(5), e1293–e1302. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2943

  7. Nord, M., & Kantor, L. S. (2006). Seasonal Variation in Food Insecurity Is Associated with Heating and Cooling Costs among Low-Income Elderly Americans. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(11), 2939–2944. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.11.2939

bottom of page